1. Does the institution train all leaders, managers, staff and students in academic integrity and misconduct?
2. What percentage of assessment uses parsimonious rubrics which enable sound and generalizable scoring?
3. What percentage of extreme low or high assessment marks are cross-checked?
4. What percentage of students are aware of the consequences of academic misconduct?
5. What percentage of assessment is reported with explanatory feedback?
6. What percentage of assessment has been designed to optimise physical and virtual delivery?
7. What percentage of assessment is woven seamlessly into students' entire educational experience?
8. What percentage of assessment is able to distinguish between different categories of learning/skill performance?
9. What percentage of assessment is marked using workflow management platforms?
10. What percentage of the institution's academic integrity policies and practices are reviewed each year?
11. What percentage of assessment is subjected to external audit each year?
12. Does the institution have a simple process for dealing with contract cheating?
13. What percentage of assessment is marked by trained, specialized and monitored assessors?
14. What percentage of students are quizzed to determine their knowledge about academic integrity and misconduct?
15. Are student results and information reported in ways which maintain confidentiality?
16. What percentage of assessment tasks are evaluated by assessment/measurement specialists?
17. What percentage of assessment uses artificial intelligence and facial recognition to prevent inappropriate activity?
18. What percentage of assessment has been designed to jointly optimize physical and virtual delivery?
19. Does the institution have a resourced and dedicated unit/office to sustain and investigate academic integrity?
20. What percent of personnel are involved in assessment-related external collaboration?
21. Does the institution have policies regarding the productivity of student assessment?
22. What percentage of assessment tasks have been designed in terms of format?
23. Is the institution's top-most board/council held accountable for assessment processes and outcomes?
24. Does the institution have clear and fair processes to support student appeals against academic misconduct?
