1. What percentage of assessment is marked by trained, specialized and monitored assessors?
2. Does the institution take steps to cultivate cultures which are supportive of improving academic integrity?
3. Does the institution have clear management procedures for determining the nature and extent of academic misconduct?
4. Does the institution have an institution-wide committee which is responsible for student assessment?
5. What percentage of assessment has been designed to optimise physical and virtual facilities?
6. What percentage of assessment results in micro-credential certification?
7. What percentage of assessment is commented/annotated using integrated analysis platforms?
8. What percentage of assessment prompts students to engage improving their learning?
9. What percentage of assessment uses parsimonious rubrics which enable sound and generalizable scoring?
10. What percentage of assessment is delivered without any practical difficulties?
11. Does the institution communicate aggregate statistics on academic misconduct to staff and students?
12. What percentage of assessment is conducted using online and digital platforms?
13. Is the institution's top-most board/council held accountable for assessment processes and outcomes?
14. What percentage of assessment is able to distinguish between different categories of learning/skill performance?
15. What percentage of assessment materials are designed, proofed and produced to a publishable standard?
16. Is the reporting of student results consistent across the institution?
17. What percentage of assessments tasks are authenticated with reference to stylistic, formatting and supplementary attributes?
18. Does the institution include accessible information about academic integrity and contract cheating in online platforms, course outlines and mandatory courses?
19. Does the institution have an efficient means for handling student complaints and appeals?
20. Are there processes in place to ensure that assessment is culturally appropriate?
21. What percentage of teachers have undertaken assessment-related professional development in the last three years?
22. Does the institution work with students and teachers to co-design academic-integrity training resources and solutions?
23. What percentage of assessment is benchmarked against previous or external results?
24. What percentage of assessment is subjected to psychometric validation?
