1. What percentage of assessment is reported with explanatory feedback?
2. Does the institution have a clearly defined contract cheating and academic integrity policy?
3. What percentage of units/subjects involve comparison of current with prior student performance?
4. What percentage of assessment is marked by trained, specialized and monitored assessors?
5. What percentage of assessment is planned and managed using scheduling management platforms?
6. What percentage of assessment is drafted and developed by more than one person?
7. What percentage of grades are reported using designed and instructive rubrics or templates?
8. What percentage of students are aware of the consequences of academic misconduct?
9. What percentage of teachers have undertaken assessment-related professional development in the last three years?
10. What percentage of assessment is linked with research or development projects?
11. What percentage of the institution's academic integrity policies and practices are reviewed each year?
12. What percentage of assessments tasks require students to use integrative, transversal and creative skills?
13. Does the institution routinely report academic misconduct statistics to the top-most board or council and senior leaders?
14. What percentage of extreme low or high assessment marks are cross-checked?
15. What percentage of total assessment marks are cross-checked?
16. Does the institution tailor communication and support regarding academic integrity to student subgroups?
17. What percentage of assessment is implemented using proctoring platforms?
18. Does the institution have a simple process for dealing with contract cheating?
19. Does the institution take steps to cultivate cultures which are supportive of improving academic integrity?
20. Does the institution use scheduling platforms to optimize assessment workflows?
21. Does the institution provide consistent messages about academic integrity at all points of study?
22. Does the institution have an approved approach to ensuring academic integrity which is transparent to teachers and students?
23. What percentage of assessment is reported in criterion-referenced ways that guide future learning?
24. What percentage of assessment yields timely feedback for students?
