1. What percentage of assessment prompts students to engage improving their learning?

2. Does the institution encourage conversations between staff and students about contract cheating?

3. Does the institution's top-most board or council receive regular updates on assessment processes and outcomes?

4. What percentage of assessment uses artificial intelligence and facial recognition to prevent inappropriate activity?

5. What percentage of assessment is commented/annotated using integrated analysis platforms?

6. What percentage of assessment is woven seamlessly into students' entire educational experience?

7. What percentage of assessment uses parsimonious rubrics which enable sound and generalizable scoring?

8. What percentage of assessment is marked by trained, specialized and monitored assessors?

9. Does the institution make clear to staff and students at what level discretion may be applied?

10. What percentage of assessment implementation is linked with formal costing?

11. Does the institution have a simple process for dealing with contract cheating?

12. Does the institution have layered structures to promote scalable approach to academic integrity?

13. What percentage of assessment tasks have been developed by commercial service/publishing/education firms?

14. What percentage of assessment is subjected to external audit each year?

15. Does the institution have clear and fair processes to support student appeals against academic misconduct?

16. Does the institution have policies regarding the productivity of student assessment?

17. Do induction and orientation practices for new students and teachers include details about academic integrity?

18. Does the institution take steps to inform all stakeholders about contract cheating?

19. Is the reporting of student results consistent across the institution?

20. What percentage of assessment results are used to plan and deliver education to future students?

21. What percentage of assessment yields timely feedback for students?

22. Does the institution use data to identify academic misconduct risks?

23. What percentage of assessment is conducted using student authentication software?

24. What percentage of assessment has been mapped to learning outcomes?