1. What percentage of assessment is marked by trained, specialised and monitored assessors?

2. What percentage of students are quizzed to determine their knowledge about academic integrity and misconduct?

3. What percentage of assessment tasks have been developed by commercial service/publishing/education firms?

4. Does the institution have a dedicated senior leader with direct responsibility for student assessment?

5. Does the institution have policies regarding the integrity of student assessment?

6. What percentage of students are satisfied with the reporting of results?

7. What percent of personnel are involved in assessment-related external collaboration?

8. What percentage of assessment is marked by trained, specialized and monitored assessors?

9. What percentage of teachers are provided with information and statistics on academic integrity and misconduct?

10. What percentage of assessment uses specialized software to collate marks and produce results?

11. Does the institution clearly define 'contract cheating' in academic integrity policies?

12. What percentage of assessment uses marking and reporting platforms?

13. Does the institution take steps to cultivate cultures which are supportive of improving academic integrity?

14. Does the institution train all leaders, managers, staff and students in academic integrity and misconduct?

15. Is the reporting of student results consistent across the institution?

16. What percentage of assessment is delivered without any administrative difficulties?

17. Are student results and information reported in ways which maintain confidentiality?

18. What percentage of assessment is conducted using student authentication software?

19. What percentage of assessment uses proctoring software?

20. What percentage of units/subjects have clearly specified learning outcomes?

21. Does the institution have clear and fair processes to support student appeals against academic misconduct?

22. What percentage of assessment has been reviewed to ensure alignment with education and professional criteria?

23. Does the institution have an efficient means for handling student complaints and appeals?

24. Does the institution implement appropriate and consistent responses to contract cheating?